The Government shutdown is on everyone’s minds, but, as always, things happen that many of us in the general public don’t think of right off the bat to keep the title’s metaphor going. The shutout comes for any fee-paying application, supplement, device or other FDA regulated product that industry attempted to submit to FDA on or after October 1, 2013.
This is not the first time that the Office of Generic Drugs (OGD) has issued a guidance document that requires firms to assure that they have essential information in their original abbreviated new drug applications to permit a substantive scientific review. Remember prior to the 1992 Hatch-Waxman final rule when an ANDA could be submitted […]
For those of you who have not yet read MaPP 5200.3 (here). Responding to Industry Inquiries with Respect to Abbreviated New Drug Application in the Office of Generic Drugs, you better have your CEOs take a Valium prior to your reporting its contents. In a nutshell, it says you can call us – but only the […]
If you are a developer of apps for a mobile platform, are your apps medical devices, and if so, what requirements do you need to meet? The answer took FDA 43 pages to lay out in their new Guidance for Mobile Medical Applications, which was issued on September 25, 2013. And the answer is, well, it depends!
Today, the FDA announced a change in labeling requirements for all Fentanyl Transdermal Systems in an effort to prevent inadvertent overdose. FDA is also warning patients and caregivers to dispose of patches properly, and warning that patches that do not adhere properly to the patient might fall off and accidentally adhere to another person, such as a child or a caregiver, or even a pet, and, based on the amount of drug left in the patch (should this occur), could cause death!
GPhA filed a Citizens Petition on September 19, asking FDA to implement its INN naming policy equally to all biologics, and, in the Petition, articulated all the arguments as to why this is a necessity for future biosimilars being approved by FDA.
IntelGenx Corporation of Saint Laurent, Quebec, Canada submitted petition FDA-2013-P-1058 (here) on August 22, 2013, asking the FDA to designate its Rizatriptan Oral Film product as AB rated (or therapeutically equivalent [TE]) when approved to Maxalt-MLT Orally Disintegrating Tablets, the reference listed drug (RLD) cited in its 505(b)(2) application. The fact that the two products might perform similarly does not overcome the fact that the products are different dosage forms.
Since December 22, 2007, the Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act has required that serious adverse event information be reported to FDA for dietary supplements and OTC drugs not approved through a new drug application. There are many questions that can come up as soon as you dig a little deeper into what is required. Some answers will be provided here, but these are meant only to call attention to the potential complexity and depth of these requirements.
On September 9, 2013, the FDA published a draft guidance designed to provide current agency thinking on the methods and testing necessary to establish bioequivalence between the reference listed drug (RLD) and the generic powder for inhalation.
Today, the FDA released Revision 1 to the Draft Guidance to Industry: Generic Drug User Fee Amendment of 2012: Questions and Answers. This 36 page document contains additional questions and answers (as well as clarifications) to some of the issues raised in the original draft guidance issued on August 22, 2012.
